Monday, February 7, 2011

#475 - Bruce Springsteen - Tunnel of Love








So, it’s been said in numerous sources (including Springsteen’s book Songs) that Bruce could never begin to top the success of Born in the U.S.A., so that he was not going to attempt it. Instead, he decided to strip the music down and compose a more personal, heartfelt album. The crazy thing about this idea is that this is an incredibly difficult feat in itself. Mostly due to the fact that most people would want to push further into that which made them successful, but also, on the flip side to that argument, many bands have been chastised for leaving that which makes them great. There are two outcomes when choosing this path: it could destroy your career or it can add to your greatness (given that the new thing attempted is heralded by fans and critics alike). Admittedly, most fans were probably expecting another Born in the U.S.A., but thankfully The Boss decided to create Tunnel of Love.

An album of deeply constructed songs about relationships, but more importantly the tolls these relationships take on a person. The expectations that come along with relationships and the vulnerability they require. Although Springsteen denies the autobiographical nature of many of the songs included on the album, it is difficult not to diagnose the lyrics contained within this album as descriptions of his marriage with actress Julianne Phillips. The difficulty of maintaining a relationship can be seen throughout songs such as “Brilliant Disguise,” “Cautious Man,” and “Tunnel of Love.” Of course, there are the stock and standard Springsteen characters all over the album, as well, in songs such as “Spare Parts.”

The album begins with my least favorite song, “Ain’t Got You.” We’ve all heard this one before. Money doesn’t buy happiness…yadda yadda yadda. The song is stomachable and even a bit catchy, but it does nothing for me. The next song, though, kicks off what becomes a major theme within the album. “Tougher Than the Rest” tells the story of a man who will never be a “handsome Dan” or “sweet-talkin’ Romeo” and his affection towards a girl who may have been around the block a few times. The main character in the song doesn’t mind this fact appealing that he is tougher than all those other guys who may not accept the girl for who she may have been in the past. This is partly due to the fact that he may have been around, as well, but more so the man’s tough skin. “All that Heaven Will Allow” focuses on the courting of a girl and the excitement that follows. I’m fairly certain that Springsteen was also singing about getting into a girl’s pants, again. “Spare Parts” starts off with one of the weirdest first lines I’ve heard in a song; “Bobby said he’d pull out, Bobby stayed in, Janey had a baby, it wasn’t any sin.” And so begins a song about the hardships of reality and growing up. Bobby leaves Janey with a baby and life changes for the young girl. Eventually, she pulls herself back together and by the end of the song show a certain amount of promise. “Cautious Man” provides the listener with Bill Horton; a man with the words “love” and “fear” tattooed on his hands. This imagery as well as the title of the song tells the listener everything he/she needs to know about this song. It is deeply rooted in the fear that comes with loving another human being and the vulnerability this ultimately requires. It is a theme that continues with “Walk Like a Man” and “Tunnel of Love.” I personally love the picture that the title track paints for the listener while comparing the rollercoaster of a relationship to an amusement park ride. I love to sing along to this song, especially the first few lines describing the fat man accepting tickets to the ride whose eyes “take a walk” all over the narrator’s girl. “Two Faces” and “Brilliant Disguise” pull together the remnants of the album’s themes. “Brilliant Disguise” while being an extremely popular song does more to explain the hesitancies and inconsistencies of a relationship than most things I’ve heard or read in my life. It’s a hauntingly beautiful song. “When You’re Alone” follows up with a tale of two people going their separate ways and the alienation that such a parting provides. The album ends with “Valentine’s Day,” providing a fitting close to an album chockfull of heartbreak, fear, and uncertainty.

The Boss does everything right on this album. I listen to this album over and over and with each listen I believe it gets better. Even the video for “Brilliant Disguise” is thoroughly admirable in its’ simplicity; something Springsteen has mastered far better than most of his contemporaries.

-d.

I hate Bruce Springsteen. I know, I know. But I have to come clean. I find him stiff and derivative, a man clinging to his influences. Granted, he does a good job of imitating the better qualities of his heroes. Nonetheless, I get tired if listening to impressions, and this album is full of them. Elvis, Van Morrison, Bob Dylan, Pete Seeger…. they’re all here. Not hidden in the least, each song could be a cover, such is the extent of the infringement. I respect the deep emotion and intensely personal lyrics and can’t fault the man for the content in that respect. It’s just too bad these beautiful and heartbreaking stories couldn’t have been told with some musical originality.

With all that out of the way…. This is the second most depressing album yet. Only Richard Thompson tops Tunnel Of Love for sheer morbidity and torment. As an emotional masochist I have to admit that earns Bruce some points in my book. At the same time, the trappings of 80’s pop music take some of the edge away. It’s hard to really feel the despondency of a slow country blues about the end of a relationship when in the midst of a finger picking guitar refrain you get blindsided by a huge blast of Korg synthesizer. I love the big Phil Collins drum echo, but it really has no place in a Guthrie-esque folk turn. And why….why the random overdriven guitar solo in the middle of "Two Faces?" If you’re going to harmonize fuzz guitar like that, just get Brian May and do it right.

There are some really nice moments here. "Valentine’s Day" is hazy reflection of Gordon Lightfoot. The quiet mandolin underplays the keys, and the simple breezy bassline plays off the root just enough to keep the listener tuned in. My favorite song here by a mile. The first half of the album is all solid, but also sees Bruce aping at his worst. Still, I prefer these songs ("Tougher Than the Rest" and "Spare Parts") over the latter half’s typical 80’s Springsteen pop. So often the last 5 songs or so (leaving out "Valentine’s") run together in an imperceptible mess of Xerox copy singer-songwriter junk. Like so many similar artist from the time, he may be an expert with words, but he shoves them all into the same basic mold. Over time, it just wears more and more on me until I give up and put on an artist with some energy. It’s amazing how often Springsteen leads me to the Dead Kennedy’s.

While we’re on an artist that let his emulation of his heroes become an obsessive quest to be them, here’s the female equivalent; Patti Smith, with her brilliant version of Bruce’s unreleased "Because The Night."

-tfm

7 comments:

  1. So, we are faulting him from having other musical influences? So his lyrics resemble that of Bob Dylan in their imagery and long-windedness, but the same can be said about Conor Oberst (equally great). I love Springsteen, but this love has only grown with the past year and a half. The writing appeals to me. Honestly, I do like his lesser known songs more than the hits, but songs like "Brilliant Disguise" are beautifully written and arranged. Some things I do agree with: you are correct about some of the musical choices throughout the album, but I believe its' greatness comes from being able to overlook these idiosyncrasies. Also, I've always had trouble with him singing about the "working man," but charging outrageous prices for tickets.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Conor Oberst can eat every inch of my phallus. Once he's done crying and telling teenage girls how genius he is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So, what you're telling me is that he's just like you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. When do I cry or talk to teenage girls? Well I mean, outside of sex. Zing...
    Anyway, I don't fault him for having influences. I fault him for lacking the creativity to sound different than them. I love Queen, but no song I've ever written sounds like them. If I want to hear someone who sounds like Van Morrison, I'll listen to Van Morrison. Lyrically he's great.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm usually a fan of these posts, but I have to say that your oversimplification and dismissal of Bruce's sound/legacy was mildly infuriating.

    I did, however, love the irony of using Pete Seeger as an example of someone whose sound Bruce hijacked on ToL. Don't get me wrong, I love Pete, but his sound was pure traditional folk, not anything out of the ordinary. If anything, he was a less vitriolic version of Woody Guthrie, who was a much bigger influence on Bruce during this period of his career than Seeger. Bruce admittedly didn't know much about Pete Seeger until around 1997 when he did a song for a Seeger tribute album and began to explore his music.

    In fact, using your logic, at least three of the 4 artists that you mentioned, can be dismissed as imitators. Bob Dylan began his career hopelessly and shamelessly devoted to being the next Woody Guthrie. His music reflected it. Seeger's politics were radical, but his music was purely traditional. And Elvis, well all he did was speed up old blues numbers and rework Gospel standards. I'm sure if I was more familiar with Van Morrison, I could find an example for him too.

    And I'm not saying its a bad thing. Music is a progression. In fact for me, one of the most fun things to do is follow that progression backwards from a source to its inspiration.

    That being said, I think dismissing Bruce as a cheap copy of his predecessors is short-sighted. Bruce has a sound that is unique to him and he has stretched it across genres from the traditional rock anthems of Born to Run to the Stark, stripped-down Nebraska and the New Orleans-inspired standards of the Seeger sessions. His stamp on American music is undeniable. No doubt one day 10 years from now some blogger will be writing a post about how if he wanted to hear someone who sounds like Bruce Springsteen, he'll listen to Bruce Springsteen.

    Still not convinced...ask Danny to do the "Dancing in the Dark" dance. It'll make a believer out of you

    ReplyDelete
  6. Agreed that Seeger was similar to Guthrie, but they were contemporaries. That's like saying NOFX ripped off Blink 182 (for a really angry rant, ask me my feelings on blink).
    Elvis is, in my mind, the opposite of Bruce. He ripped off lyrics but created an entire new style. Bruce was an evolution in lyricists but his sound is derivative. I guess to specify, it's not just that he has a similar style. There are thousands of years of music, so to sound completely original is impossible. But I hear distinct melodies in his music that have been used before. Same reason I find fault with some of the Beatles material.
    Oh and to make people even more angry, I don't particularly like Dylan either. Don't hate him though, just not a fan. As for Van Morrison, that guy is insane. He sounds completely different on each song.
    I'd be interested in seeing Danny dance, although I'd like to see him do the Wham! dance from Wake Me Up Before You GoGo.
    Good news is that Otis Redding is up next and I think we'll all agree on that one.

    ReplyDelete